Secure messaging
Best HIPAA-Compliant Secure Messaging for Clinics
A comparison of secure messaging platforms clinics evaluate under a BAA: TigerConnect, OnPage, Halo Health, Spruce Health, and Klara.
Decision summary
Secure messaging breaks into two shapes: clinician-to-clinician and clinician-to-patient. The vendor that fits depends on which problem you are solving. All five below provide a BAA on their paid plans.
Pick the right shape before you pick the vendor
Secure messaging splits cleanly into two problems: clinicians messaging each other about patient care, and clinicians messaging patients. Both need a signed BAA, but they need different features. Shortlists that blur the two end up with a tool that does neither well.
All five vendors below provide a BAA on their paid plans. None of their free or trial tiers should be used for PHI.
The five vendors clinics actually evaluate
TigerConnect. Clinician-to-clinician focused, with strong on-call scheduling, role-based paging, and EHR integration. Widely used in hospital and multi-site group practices where “who is on call for cardiology tonight” is a daily question.
OnPage. Clinician-to-clinician focused with an emphasis on critical alerting and escalation. Stronger at paging-style urgent workflows than at casual team chat.
Halo Health. Clinician-to-clinician and clinical team collaboration. Similar category to TigerConnect with focus on care-team coordination and role-based routing.
Spruce Health. Clinician-to-patient focused. Unified inbox for SMS, voice, fax, and secure chat with patients. A good fit for independent and small-group clinics that want a single patient-communication channel under a BAA.
Klara. Clinician-to-patient focused. Two-way patient messaging with EHR integration. Leans toward specialty clinics (dermatology, aesthetics, mental health) that do high-volume patient back-and-forth.
The comparison that actually matters
| Vendor | BAA | Primary use | Audit trail | Pricing model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TigerConnect | Included on paid plans | Clinician-to-clinician | Message-level logs | Per-user |
| OnPage | Included on paid plans | Critical paging | Message-level logs | Per-user |
| Halo Health | Included on paid plans | Care-team collaboration | Message-level logs | Per-user |
| Spruce Health | Included on paid plans | Clinician-to-patient | Message-level logs | Per-provider |
| Klara | Included on paid plans | Clinician-to-patient | Message-level logs | Per-provider |
Pricing details change; ask the vendor and confirm the BAA is included on the plan you are buying.
Policy is where most programs fail
Signing a BAA and buying the tool is the easy part. The program work is the policy:
- Who is allowed to message patients, and from what device.
- What types of PHI are appropriate for messaging versus a phone call.
- Retention period for messages and how they link back to the chart.
- What happens when a workforce member leaves and still has the mobile app installed.
- How a patient’s revocation of consent to text is recorded and enforced.
These are acceptable-use and workforce policies. They belong in your policy library with signed attestations, not in a Slack announcement that nobody remembers three months later.
What secure messaging does not cover
The messaging vendor handles the transmission and the logs. It does not run your compliance program. Training cadence, BAA register, incident log, and access reviews live in the operating layer. See PHIGuard pricing or the full HIPAA software comparison for that layer. For the underlying rules, see HIPAA basics. Telehealth-first practices should also review HIPAA software for telehealth providers since messaging and video policy usually ship together.
The practical rule: if it is PHI, it does not belong in a personal SMS thread. Ever.
Sources
- TigerConnect HIPAA | TigerConnect
- OnPage HIPAA | OnPage
- Klara HIPAA | Klara